Preserving Freedom of Choice: REPTA’s Commitment to Combating Positive Lists

In recent times, the reptile and exotic pet community in the UK has found itself at the forefront of a crucial battle—one that could significantly impact the freedom of choice for enthusiasts and responsible keepers. The looming threat comes in the form of a proposed positive list, a regulatory measure that could potentially dictate which species of animals are deemed suitable to be kept as companions. REPTA, the Reptile and Exotic Pet Trade Association, stands firm in its commitment to fight against the implementation of such lists, advocating for a balanced approach that considers the welfare of animals without unduly restricting the rights of responsible keepers.

The Positive List Debate

At the heart of the matter is the ongoing debate over the efficacy of positive lists as a regulatory tool. Positive lists prescribe a specific set of species that are allowed to be kept as companions, often based on criteria such as ease of care, potential risk to the environment, and perceived suitability as pets. REPTA would assert that they oversimplify a complex issue and may inadvertently limit the diversity and richness of the exotic pet community.

Anti-Reptile Lobby and Positive Lists

It’s crucial to acknowledge that the push for positive lists is not a neutral or objective effort. Rather, it has been strongly propelled by an anti-reptile keeping lobby that seeks to impose restrictions on the keeping of reptiles as companions. Recognising the significance of this influence, REPTA is actively engaged in countering these efforts to ensure that any regulatory decisions are based on a fair and comprehensive understanding of the reptile-keeping community.

The Scale of Reptile Keeping in the UK

To appreciate the scope of the issue, it’s essential to consider the sheer diversity and popularity of reptile keeping in the UK. According to a recent survey conducted by Exotics Keeper magazine, nearly 1,000 species of reptiles and amphibians are currently kept as companions. A 2021 survey by the Federation of British Herpetologists (FBH) and the Pet Food Manufacturers Association (PFMA) estimated that the total population of reptiles and amphibians kept as companion animals in the UK is a staggering 8.8 million. These figures underscore the vibrant and expansive nature of the reptile-keeping community.

REPTA’s Stance and Commitment

REPTA firmly believes that positive lists are not the answer to addressing concerns that the government may have about companion species. Instead, the association advocates for a more nuanced and science-based approach to regulation. By actively opposing the implementation of positive lists, REPTA aims to safeguard the rights of responsible keepers, ensuring that they can continue to contribute to the diversity and welfare of companion species.

The Need for Science-Based Regulation

Rather than relying on arbitrary lists, REPTA emphasises the importance of science-based regulation that considers the specific needs of individual species. By collaborating with experts and utilising data-driven insights, regulatory decisions can be made that prioritise animal welfare without compromising the passion and dedication of responsible keepers.

Educating and Advocating

REPTA alongside Responsible Reptile Keeping (RRK) is dedicated to dispelling myths surrounding reptile keeping and actively engages in educational initiatives to promote responsible ownership. By fostering a culture of understanding and appreciation for these unique companions, the association works towards breaking down stereotypes and fostering an environment where regulations are informed by knowledge rather than preconceived biases.

Collaborative Efforts

Recognising the gravity of the situation, REPTA collaborates with like-minded organisations, experts, and enthusiasts to present a unified front against the implementation of positive lists. Through dialogue, education, and advocacy, the association seeks to influence policy decisions in a way that respects the rights of keepers and prioritises the welfare of the animals they cherish.

Conclusion

In conclusion, REPTA’s commitment to fighting against the potential implementation of positive lists in the UK reflects a dedication to preserving the freedom of choice for responsible keepers and maintaining the vibrancy of the reptile-keeping community. By actively engaging in the debate, advocating for science-based regulation, and collaborating with others who share a similar vision, REPTA stands as a formidable force in ensuring that any regulatory decisions are fair, informed, and considerate of the rich tapestry of species and enthusiasts within our community.

Together, we can work towards a future where responsible reptile keeping thrives, guided by thoughtful regulation that respects both the welfare of the animals and the passion of their keepers.

Scroll to Top